Jerry has significant experience advocating for and against intervention. A person may intervene in a case between other parties under certain circumstances, such as but not limited to, where the person claims an interest in the subject of the suit and resolving the litigation without that person may as a practical matter impair or impede the person's ability to protect that interest.
FLAGLER INV. MARIETTA, LLC V. MULTIBANK 2009-1 CRE VENTURE, LLC
Flagler Inv. Marietta, LLC v. Multibank 2009-1 CRE Venture, LLC, 633 Fed. Appx. 747 (11th Cir. 2015) (lead counsel for FDIC) (reversing a district court order remanding to state court a case in which FDIC intervened and holding that FDIC timely removed the case within 90 days of the state court granting intervention under FDIC's […]
... [Read more...]
DEUTSCHE BANK NAT'L TRUST CO. V. FDIC
Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. FDIC, 717 F.3d 189 (D.C. Cir. 2013) (argued for FDIC) (holding that bondholders of Washington Mutual Bank (WaMu) possessing $6 billion in allowed claims against the WaMu receivership lacked Article III and prudential standing to intervene in a contract dispute between FDIC and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., about whether […]
... [Read more...]
